In Over My Head

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Good storytelling…in the right context April 30, 2007

Filed under: Assignment, Reading — trinx @ 5:11 pm

Reading Kimberly Appelcline’s “The Elements of Good Storytelling” makes me glad that someone is considering what the rules are, but I wonder why there’s no discussion of context. Uncle Harry’s story about disemboweling a Viet Cong fighter in the tunnels of Cu Chi might be a great story–well told, historically important, exciting–but his great-niece’s wedding rehearsal dinner is not the right place for it.

I see this happen on the Web fairly often. Sometimes an entrepreneur decides that his or her personal story is the company story that investors want to hear. It’s a hell of a tale, sure, but it doesn’t belong on the “About Us” link.

A certain large online retailer that shall remain nameless once put up, in its humble early years, a huge bar chart on the home page that compared its inventory to that of its big-name rival. No merchandise appeared above the fold, just the bar chart. It was compelling, sure, in a second-grade, neener-neener kind of way. To the visitors who just wanted to find what they were looking for, it was distracting and annoying.

Discussion questions: Why are we sometimes attracted to the spare (Hemingway) and sometimes to the baroque (Jorge Luise Borges)?  How do these different modes translate to the web?

 

Newspapers–the present and the future April 24, 2007

Filed under: Uncategorized — trinx @ 4:31 pm

Here’s an interesting blog relevant to last week’s reading, the Coursey article about paid vs. free content.

 

Making It Look Good April 22, 2007

Filed under: Assignment, Reading — trinx @ 11:02 pm

This article by Vanderdonckt takes visual design principles relevant to typography and applies them to web design. This seems like a pretty logical place to start discussing web design.

I am still having some trouble completely understanding his definition of interactive and interaction objects and how they differ, but Vanderdonckt glosses over that to move directly into a discussion of layout grids and the various techniques that can be used to direct the viewer’s eye. The conclusion discusses “impact” on the viewer, but I find the body of the article surprisingly lacking in a discussion of the impact of each technique and therefore not as useful as it might have been otherwise. Still, it seems like a reasonably comprehensive discussion of each technique, and something we can certainly pay attention to when planning our projects.

I remember putting together my home page on GeoCities in 1996. I knew nothing, of course, and none of the famous web design books had been written yet — all I had was that fat book on HTML. My one instinct was to interleave text and photos, with the photos placed right-left-right-left down the page. Sequential, predictable, consistent, totally flat, and very much a product of its age.

 

Site analyses April 16, 2007

Filed under: Assignment — trinx @ 10:38 pm

OK, I’m late with this.

Sideways: The two-color design is clean, with clever graphics and animation and clear links. (I’m impressed by the link to Rotten Tomatoes–in fact, I’m pretty impressed with all the links.) The music is repetitive and annoying; thank goodness the designers included a link to turn it off.

IMDB: This film-nerd haven has always been a very text-heavy site, and has not changed much in the last few years. It’s almost shocking that Amazon.com has left it alone, but I respect them for that decision (and after all, 47 million movie lovers per month can’t be wrong). It’s an information site, not a commercial one. Searching gives you all the data you could possibly want. Still, browsing is difficult, the color scheme is basically just ugly, and it wouldn’t kill them to clean up the logo and fonts on the home page.

Grey’s Anatomy: I’ve never seen the show, and now that I’ve seen the site, I don’t know whether I ever will see the show. First of all, I don’t want to watch or listen to an unsolicited music video when I go to the site (and certainly not an advertisement for an unrelated movie). Second, white text on a light blue background is hard on the eyes. Finally, I clicked around a lot just trying to find a premise for the show, and was never really satisfied. Next!

Guy Simplant: This site is extremely clever and I got into it, but once again, I had to turn the sound WAY down. The interactive features were great fun, but the loud dings and honks were intrusive.

NIH: This site is much too wordy and not very interactive, except for the Create-a-Diet activity, which is genuinely educational. Come on, Bush Administration, surely you can do better than this.

AHA: This site has a very old-school, Web 1.0 feel, partly due to the clunky navigation and partly to the tired color scheme. There must be a ton of great information here, but I don’t even feel like looking for it.

 

Figuring out CM April 16, 2007

Filed under: Reading — trinx @ 4:28 pm

I read “Getting Content Management Right” by Megan Santosus, which I hope was the right article. Not much of any surprise there, except that Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Rhode Island waited until 2003 to purchase an automated content management system. (I understand the hesitation a bit–it takes some cash and some time to train content owners to use a system. Still, it sounds as though they were practically drowning in content.) I wonder if there are any corporate websites left that don’t use ACM; if so, I’d like to know what they are so I can direct my investment dollars elsewhere

I found David Coursey’s article, “Manage, Don’t Mangle, Your Digital Assets,” both very informative and incredibly irritating. I made the mistake of clicking on the annoying Sun and Microsoft advertising links that are PART of the article. I’ve never seen this before–have I had my head in the sand, or is it a new practice? After that, I spent some time puzzling out the boldface sentences with links to archived content before realizing that they weren’t directly related to the nearby content and their placement was not particularly well chosen. Why doesn’t Publish put these links at the bottom of the article? Slate Magazine does this kind of linking very seductively (see the “Related in Slate” section at the bottom of this page for a good example).

It’s completely ironic and completely true that people are unwilling to pay for regularly delivered e-content even if they’re willing to buy the same thing (i.e., a magazine or newspaper) on paper. However, I think the New York Times has gotten paid content right with their TimesSelect service, which allows subscribers to access 100 special articles (generally archived material and some op-ed columns) per month for a $49.95 annual fee. I came somewhat reluctantly to TimesSelect after getting dinged $3.95 for the single-article fee fifteen or twenty times over the course of a year. I now typically use about 10 of my 100 articles each month, but of course I feel like I’m getting a good deal.

Coursey’s point that e-mailed links should bypass site registration is right on the nail. If someone sends me an article from the Dubuque Telegraph Herald, registering with them is the last thing I want to do. Before the Wall Street Journal started allowing subscribers to e-mail working links, you couldn’t read their stories at all unless you were also a subscriber, which was even more agonizing.

 

More on mind-blowing hypertext April 10, 2007

Filed under: Uncategorized — trinx @ 8:30 pm

I Googled around some more, and discovered at last that the first hypertext I saw, which I blogged about a couple of days ago, was a HyperCard stack called If Monks Had Macs by Brian Thomas (apologies to Mark Bernstein for my faulty memory). Apparently IMHM is still going strong; here’s a link.

 

The Universe is Built of Strings April 9, 2007

Filed under: Proposal — trinx @ 10:31 pm

My individual project proposal: I’d like to build a webpage that explains string theory and its variants in very simple terms, using some graphics (and possibly Flash), and including some judicious linking out to reliable sources.

 

Hypertext, and how it blows my mind April 9, 2007

Filed under: Reading — trinx @ 10:11 pm

Some background serendipity: When I started to read Mark Bernstein’s hypertext article, I quickly realized that I needed some context, so I Googled him. The story he blogged about most recently on his personal webpage, markbernstein.org, was one I had read myself in the Washington Post on Sunday, and had already told several people about because it was so amazing. (Brief summary: Mega-famous violinist Joshua Bell, accompanied by some undercover Post reporters, went busking in a DC Metro station with his $3.5 million violin, making a little over $30 in 45 minutes of playing; he was recognized by only one of the hundreds of people who passed by.) What Bernstein blogged about before that was the second book by Rory Stewart, whose first book, The Places In Between, I read and loved pretty recently.

I believe Bernstein and/or his colleagues at Eastgate Systems might have had something to do with the first hypertext I ever saw, an amazing collection of linked stories and graphics on Macintosh HD floppies that I sent away for after finding a mail-away card in a Mac magazine in 1990 or so. I stuck those into my work computer and ended up spending much of the weekend at the office. I couldn’t get enough of that feeling of having the cobwebs blown out of my mind, after years of that horrible chunk-chunk-grind-whine that seemed to characterize personal computer usage. I’ve often thought nostalgically about that multi-faceted hypertext, and how the corners of the Internet that I’ve traversed have generally failed to come up to its literary (and technical, if that is how to refer to link topology) standard. Armed with that memory, I settled down to try to understand “Patterns of Hypertext.” This proved difficult, as (except for that experience 17 years ago) I haven’t spent much time seeking out artful hypertext. The closest I’ve come to the experience I felt when I read that first hypertext was in 1996, when I started reading suck.com. It was clever in a different way, but it worked brilliantly with what must have been some of the patterns Bernstein writes about. (Speaking of which, the patterns I understood best were the ones with the little line illustrations.)

After some thought, now, I realize that the Internet is simply a place I turn to for information, rather than a way to spend hours in meandering enlightenment. I’m holding that thought, and intending to search out some of the hypertext from Eastgate. I’m bitterly disappointed that I no longer use a Mac, because it means I can’t download Tinderbox, Eastgate’s “personal content management assistant,” which I’m convinced would give me that feeling again, dammit.

This isn’t really about the reading, I guess, but more about the reader. I don’t have much to say about the reading, except that thinking about these patterns opened my mind again, just a little bit, and blew out a few cobwebs. The main problem for me as a content creator is that this kind of super-thoughtful hyperlinking is an entirely new aspect of writing, like playing 3-D chess. I’m afraid I may be too lazy.

 

Seattle: A Kid’s-Eye View April 6, 2007

Filed under: Assignment — trinx @ 5:12 pm

I’m a little burned out on media ownership, and feeling very fond of Seattle at the moment, so both of my group project ideas are Seattle-centered.

First idea: I always wondered what it would be like to grow up in Seattle–a cooler, bluer, saner spot than, er, where I grew up. Driving through neighborhoods like Ballard, Seward Park, Phinney Ridge , I sometimes spot kids getting off the school bus and think, what do they think about Seattle? Are they hoping to inherit the house they grew up in, or are they counting the days until they can move far, far away and have 300 days of sunshine a year? I couldn’t wait to leave my hometown, but if I’d grown up in a place with a moist, caffeinated, space-age vibe like Seattle, things would have been different.

One thing about Seattle that many of us transplants notice right away is the distinctive flavor of its neighborhoods. Belltown is very different from Ballard, though both are cool. Our kids notice completely different things than we do. I know where all the good coffee places are; my daughter knows where Baskin-Robbins is. I’m interested in creating a Seattle neighborhoods site where we show playground maps, toy stores, story times, and other spots beloved of the Captain Underpants set. It would link to lists from other publications, like the Times and P-I, that have schedules of special events.

Second idea: There are people in Seattle who have a little time to volunteer, but not a lot, or who don’t want to go far from home. It would be great to have a site where you could enter your address and have a map come up that shows both short-term and ongoing volunteer opportunities near your house. Nonprofits could add to the database themselves. There could even be a “little old lady” bulletin board, where people could let their neighbors know that they need help getting the tomatoes weeded, or have a burned-out bulb too high to reach. (Obviously, we’d have to figure out a way to make that a secure situation.) I think this also plays off the neighborhood concept in a good way.

 

Readability tests April 4, 2007

Filed under: Assignment — trinx @ 2:16 am

This week’s Science column in the NYT:
“A Mutinous Group of Cells on a Greedy, Destructive Path” by Natalie Angier
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/03/health/03angi.html?ref=science

readability of first two paragraphs:

ASL = 40.5

PH = 9.3

GFI = 19.92

Peter Carlson’s Magazine Reader column in the Washington Post, this week entitled “Harper’s Bizarre But GQ Banal“:

ASL = 16.0

PH = 5.2

GFI = 8.48

E! Online, Planet Gossip column, “Heather Mills’ Cover-Up at Dancing With the Stars

ASL = 14.8

PH = 3.0

GFI =  7.1

News story:

Zamboni Driver Skates by Drunken Driving Law (cnn.com)

ASL = 21.0

PH = 9.5

GFI = 12.2